zohreh akhavanmoghaddam
Abstract
The life of Imam Javad (a.s.) is distinguished from other imams due to some phenomena; Because during the era of his noble father and grandfather, beliefs were created among the Shiites that deviated some people from the truth and led them to falsehood and caused them to not accept his Imamate and created ...
Read More
The life of Imam Javad (a.s.) is distinguished from other imams due to some phenomena; Because during the era of his noble father and grandfather, beliefs were created among the Shiites that deviated some people from the truth and led them to falsehood and caused them to not accept his Imamate and created doubts in this context. The present article deals with the behavior of Imam Reza (a.s.) in a descriptive-analytical manner, while enumerating the doubts entered in this matter, and the typology of his confrontation in dealing with the doubts. The research showed that the three currents of "waqf" thinking since the time of the 7th Imam, in the sense of "the end of the Imamate in the province of Imam Kazim (a.s.)" on the one hand, "creating doubts about the sterility of Imam Reza (a.s.)" on the other hand, and also, "Imam Javad (a.s.) was seven years old at the time of his father's martyrdom", greatly caused doubts among the Shiites, and this required the necessary grounding by the eighth Imam. Imam Reza (a.s.) with the news about the birth of Imam Javad (a.s.), Rejecting the doubts of Waqfiyyah with Quranic and rational reasons and other examples, they sought to answer the doubtsof interpreting the Qur'an to the Qur'an is the only method of the Ahl al-Bayt. peace be upon him and it should be considered one of the characteristics of the Shia religion
zohreh akhavanmoghaddam; shala haghi
Abstract
One of the most important and frequent Quranic teachings is the subject of repentance. Repentance or return is attributed to both God and servant. In speculative theology (Kalām) of sects, although there is consensus between Shi'a and Mu'tazila on some topics, accepting repentance is not the case. Mu'tazilites ...
Read More
One of the most important and frequent Quranic teachings is the subject of repentance. Repentance or return is attributed to both God and servant. In speculative theology (Kalām) of sects, although there is consensus between Shi'a and Mu'tazila on some topics, accepting repentance is not the case. Mu'tazilites of Basra believe that accepting repentance is an intellectual obligation on behalf of God, and if he does not accept, he has performed an ugly act, while Ashʿarites, Imāmīyyah, and Mu'tazilites of Baghdad believe that accepting repentance is due to God's grace over his servants. The Mu'tazila have based their claims on two rational reasons and a Qur'anic reason, and their belief is centered on "permanence in fire for sinners". The results of this study, conducted by analytical-descriptive method, indicate that such a belief will lead to "people’s influence on god" and "God’s deserving of blame ", both of which are impossible. According to several verses, God has promised the acceptance of repentance from the sinner, and breach of promise is ugly; thus, accepting repentance is not rational but is aural, and because God has promised to accept it, he accepts it.
Zohre Akhavan Moghadam; Fereshteh Taheri
Abstract
The current article has been compiled to explain comparatively the issue of the temporal contingency of the material world according to the views of four Islamic denominations, Mu'tazila, Ash'arites, Matradaiyeh, and Shiites, in addition to Avicenna, the Muslim philosopher and the founder of the philosophy ...
Read More
The current article has been compiled to explain comparatively the issue of the temporal contingency of the material world according to the views of four Islamic denominations, Mu'tazila, Ash'arites, Matradaiyeh, and Shiites, in addition to Avicenna, the Muslim philosopher and the founder of the philosophy of peripatetic. First, the article addresses a preliminary statement about the meaning of temporary contingency and its opposite, namely the eternality and meaning of the Universe, as expressed by the heads of Sunni religious denominations, the Mu'tazilites and the Ash'arites and Materidiyya, by directly referring to the sayings of the heads of these denominations, then, in this article, the theory of Avicenna has been explained, and finally, the authors have judged these theories. Among the results of this paper is that the theologian rule for the contingency of the universe is failed. The problem of the creation of matter from nothing makes a problem for both philosophers and theologians. And finally, it
